Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef vs Small Nachos with Pork
Zambrero Small Nachos with Pork is the lighter choice, by 24 calories. Zambrero Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef packs more protein (3.8g more). For protein per calorie, Zambrero Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef is more efficient (4.7g per 100 cal).
The Zambrero Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef has 24 more calories and 3.8 g more protein than the Zambrero Small Nachos with Pork.
| Per serve | Small Nachos with Barbacoa BeefZambrero | Small Nachos with PorkZambrero |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 521 cal | 497 cal |
| Kilojoules | 2180 kJ | 2080 kJ |
| Protein | 24.3 g | 20.5 g |
| Total Fat | 33.0 g | 31.5 g |
| Saturated Fat | 10.8 g | 9.5 g |
| Carbohydrates | 31.2 g | 30.7 g |
| Sugar | 7.0 g | 6.9 g |
| Fibre | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| Sodium | 955.0 mg | 883.0 mg |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has fewer calories, the Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef or the Small Nachos with Pork?
The Zambrero Small Nachos with Pork is lower, with 497 calories vs 521.
Which has more protein, the Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef or the Small Nachos with Pork?
The Zambrero Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef has more, with 24.3g vs 20.5g.
Is the Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef or the Small Nachos with Pork healthier?
Zambrero Small Nachos with Pork is the lighter choice, by 24 calories. Zambrero Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef packs more protein (3.8g more). For protein per calorie, Zambrero Small Nachos with Barbacoa Beef is more efficient (4.7g per 100 cal). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — use the calculator to customise either one.